I think the cartoons are insulting and at the same time I would fight for the right to publish them-----there is no free press where there is no right to publish controversial material. This notion is lost on the Muslims--just as it is lost on the fundamentalist christians--- and they are both enemies of free speech---which is a basic value of our western civilization and the culmination of 2000 years of western development.
The basic fact is that muslim societies provide models of what we in the west aspire not to be.
Women as second class citizens, chopping your hand off for petty theft, jail time for any depiction of religious figures (depiction of religious figures is the foundation of western art!), dictatorship and theocracy, the rule of religious dogma over the rule of law. The fact is that muslim societies are at a point of development similar to that of Europe 700 years ago! Any insinuation of muslim culture into Europe
--unless it is the benign sufism---is a step backward to our common western civilization and must be resisted. The Danish cartoons have drawn a line between the two cultures-- and, as you can see, the mere drawing of the line is enough to cause a paroxism in the muslim world. Similar caricatures of Jesus might be considered offensive
by many Europeans-- but few would call for censorship--most everyone recognizes that free speech is fundamental.
The real enemy is fundamentalism and the muslim variety is particularly virulent and we must protect our hard won European freedoms against it.
To do anything else is the undermining of the fundamental character of our western civilization.
We must now all stick together in order to counter the challange and threat.

I say if they want war, they should get one but it shouldnt be a conventional warfare. let's nuke'em fast and furious. It should be like spraying useless pests in your garden

Well, the problem of course is that what you are advocating is genocide. It may come to that: I can see at least three routes by which we could end up at that point. (Nuclear terrorism, Iranian nuclear weapons development provoking Israeli nuclear attack, and radicalization of the entire Muslim world leading to vastly stepped-up terrorism) But I think it's fair to say that we should try to avoid genocide, rather than embracing it. The whole point of the American strategy is to pull the social rug out from under the terrorists, so that the problem goes away from lack of motivation on the enemy's side. I would rather that our strategy work, than that someone resort to nuclear genocide to solve the problem.