I can relate to Michael Totten's feelings on political parties:
Regular readers of this site know that I can relate to Jeff’s experience and frustration. And the end result of all this has been for me to finally agree and say to heck with it, I'm not one of you after all. I'm an Independent now. And despite the fact that I still hold several liberal opinions, I no longer feel any sense of loyalty or affection for the Democratic Party.
I became a Libertarian, but they were losing me even before 9/11, by being so unable to articulate a set of positions that would work in the real world. Their isolationism completely lost me after 9/11, and I'll no more go back there than I would to the Republicans.
I cannot go to the Democrats, because of their wallowing in Leftists immiseration as a kind of reflexive purging of self-induced guilt about being part of a culture that has something to offer the world besides misery.
I cannot find a political party that accomodates me. I am a libertarian, republican, liberal, federalist, free-market (not far away from laissez-faire), interventionalist, natural rights respecting American with no place to go. As Treebeard said, "I am not entirely on anybody's side, because nobody is entirely on my side." Yep, that about says it all.
Basically, I want the government to be as non-interventionist as possible in the lives and business of individual Americans, while being willing and able to spread Liberty abroad both by example and (in cases where no other method is available and where we are under threat) by force. I want the government to defend my rights, and only intrude so far as to prevent my usurpation or infringement of the rights of others. Provision of services should be minimal at the Federal level, both for tax reasons and because local solutions tend to work out better over the long run, while allowing an out (moving to another State) should regulations become excessive in any given place. I want the government to allow businesses free rein to operate, with just enough regulation to prevent or punish fraud. I want to only have to think about the government on rare occasions, unless I chose to do so. I want the Right to stay out of the front of my pants, and the Left to stay out of the back. I want elections to be meaningless. I want the government to provide a free and secure place for culture to develop, without trying to compel the form of the resultant culture. I want the government to prevent or punish discrimination by government employees, while not tarnishing the private right of free association. I want the government to provide intellectual property rights for a limited time, not perpetually.
I want a political party that would work to bring all of these about. Until then, I'm an independent.
UPDATE (1/8): Aubrey comments.
My question is what does an "independent" really mean? Independent of what? What does a "centrist"? What do you believe to be true? Just? Whatever is not Right or Left? Whatever parts you like, ignoring contradictions?
Like you I quit the LP (and political parties in general) after 9-11. But I still find it useful to call myself a libertarian, even though I disagree with what many libertarians enspouse. But it is a good enough word to explain the bulk of my beliefs (though sometimes "classical liberal" or "pragmatic individualist" better suits me).
Good post BTW.
Posted by: Ryan on January 7, 2004 03:22 PMTo me, "independent" means that I am not a member of, registered as, nor contributor to any political party. I am independent of party affiliation.
A centrist, in my usage, is one who is neither radically statist, nor radically libertarian, nor radically free-market, nor radically communist.
It would take a long time to describe what I believe to be true and just in any way I'd be prepared to defend. That would be a long, and interesting (to me), post to write, so I may try to do so. In the meantime, you can get an idea of where I stand from this post.
"Left" and "Right" are too constricting for reasonable discussion. I think that in some cases, the Right is correct in its views, even some of its extreme views, and in other cases the Left is correct in its views, even its extreme views. Sometimes, each side comes to the right conclusion for the wrong reasons. In that limited vocabulary, I cannot adequately describe what I believe on most issues. Worse, I cannot even really describe what constitutes "Left" and "Right". I have a perception of each, but not a definition.
As I said in the post, "I am a libertarian, republican, liberal, federalist, free-market (not far away from laissez-faire), interventionalist, natural rights respecting American with no place to go."